March 31, 2005

There Has To Be Something Wrong With This Action

But I'm actually going to link to an op-ed in today's Opinion Journal by Richard freakin' Gere.

{...}The cause of Tibet is now at a critical juncture. After decades of diplomatic stalemate, talks began again in 2002 between Beijing and the Dalai Lama's envoy, Lodi Gyari. Mr. Gyari described the latest round of talks last year as the most serious exchange of views so far. As the Dalai Lama has repeatedly stated for decades now, the issue is not Tibetan independence from China but rather genuine Tibetan autonomy within the overall structure of a sovereign but benevolent China. This is not unreasonable or unobtainable. The model of Hong Kong certainly comes to mind.

So now, more than ever, Beijing needs to feel outside pressure if we are to ensure that talks continue. Europe and Washington's most substantial means for pressure is certainly the weapons embargo, which they imposed on China after the Tiananmen Square demonstrations in 1989. Yet the EU is now seriously considering lifting the embargo--it should not. Sixteen years later, China still has not substantively addressed the human rights abuses that led to the embargo, and, in fact, many of those involved in the 1989 demonstrations continue to linger in prison. In Tibet itself, severe restrictions on freedom of expression, association and religion remain in place. This record should not be rewarded with weapons exports.

All the more so since China enacted an anti-secession law providing it with the legal authority to attack Taiwan should it proceed further toward self-rule. The timing of this legislation contains a lesson for the EU. It was unthinkable until now because China lacked the capability to launch an invasion across the 100 miles of the Taiwan Strait. However, Beijing has invested billions of dollars in Russian-made submarines, destroyers and other weapons. Therefore, lifting the embargo could accelerate Beijing's buying spree and enable even greater Chinese aggression.{...}

While I believe it's a naive position to hope and negotiate for an autonomous, yet PRC occupied, Tibet, and it's doomed to failure, Gere makes some very good points about the message the EU would send to the PRC if it lifted its arms embargo.

Now this is one instance where I wouldn't mind him "speaking for the world."

UPDATE: Related like Peking Duck is related to Sweet and Sour Pork:Beautiful Atrocities

Posted by Kathy at March 31, 2005 11:12 AM
Comments

Its a pretty good piece. Color me cynical, but I wonder who drafted it for him to submit under his name. Just saying.

Posted by: RP at March 31, 2005 03:17 PM

I don't think he wrote it either. You're not alone in your cynicsm.

Posted by: Kathy at March 31, 2005 05:13 PM

I even surprised myself saying "Gere is right" (no matter if anyone wrote it for him)

Posted by: Fausta at April 1, 2005 09:15 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?